How Does Art and Music Relates to Each Other Essay Example for Free

How Does Art and Music Relates to Each Other Essay Art and music bring many cultures from all around the world together. Both express thoughts, emotions, stories, views, ideas, and opinions of human life. For instance, art is a form of expression as well as music. Moreover, music describe a person’s culture, life, feeling and hobbies as well as art. It is how people liberty to express themselves through music in whichever way they prefer. as well as art and what people confront on a daily basis. Furthermore, art and music has change over time and it has influence in the way we dress and dance. It also reflects on violence and drugs. Finally, have an extremely negative impact on the attitudes and behaviors of American youth. Music affects society now in days by influencing teens in the wrong way. For instance, music videos have made a humongous impact on the behavior of teens. Moreover, teens flaunt their bosoms around just because they see it on the videos so they portray the same image thinking that is the style. For example, Adriana, a cousin she dresses something similar to that and her response is that is what is in. Also, the way teens dance through music. For example, the songs Bring it, Donk, Ass by listening to this type of songs they start twerking dancing. In particular, a dance that teases and inappropriately moves. It consists of how you shake your behind. personality my perspectives about those move dances are inhuman. In addition, this type of songs has made an impact on the dances and it has everybody twerking. A dance that consist of shaking hips and bottom and bouncing up and down motion, causing to shake, wobble and jiggle . Another, huge impact would be the song and dance called The Twist it had have a tremendous impact back in the days. many people were against it but some were not. Foremost, John Johnson Jr. â€Å"The Twist† The Los Angeles Times, 2013) states. â€Å"Soon, the fad hopped generations, sweeping up the â€Å"Mad Men† set of swinging company men and their hip-shaking wives. Therefore, regardless if the song influences in an appropriate dance it is still going to be a big hit and it is going to have everybody dancing. Another, social message that is transmitting through music and art is the violence. For example, some friends would always-encountered dangerous scenes because of the designs imprinted on their clothes gang related as well as the music consisting of disrespecting others. onsequently, they were getting shoot at. In addition, my cousin Arthur was involved in the Mafia. He was kill in Mexico 3 years ago because of the music he used to listing to drugs as well as the clothes he used to were. His clothes had a picture of Mal Verde a major drug dealer. The drug music would inspire him to fight. He had a tragic death that was never solve he was kidnap and torture to death. In addition, many people are being influence in the drug life because of their admiration to those kinds of art as well as the music. On the other hand, it can inspire others to get out of that life style. For example, Biello, Johnson Jr. (â€Å"The Twist† The Los Angeles Times, 2013) states that â€Å"Biello, who hope the Twist would ease his exit from the Mob, never did get out. He was assassinated in 1967, in broad daylight in downtown Miami. The crime was never solved but was likely part of a power struggle in the top ranks of Mafia leadership. † Moreover, music and art is meant for uplifting and encouraging people yet over the years it has become degrading. Finally, the way it influences the teens today. The more aggressive the music, probably the more grumpy and rebellion they tend to get. The beauty of music has exploited into evil things. For instance, the music today such as rap and hip-hop has profanity and that is the type of music that teens listing today. Consequently, can be influential, and they will try to crazy things. In conclusion, art is music it is what gives life a meaning. For example, to share ideas, express feeling, tell a story It is what brings many different cultures together from all over the world. Weather it brings out good or bad messages it is still a form of art.

Overview of The Cold War :: essays research papers

The Soviet Union and the United States served as Allies during World War II. At the end of the war however each side wanted to deal with the aftermath differently. The United States was in favor of a peaceful and cooperative relationship with Germany and their Allies. The Soviet Union wanted revenge on the crimes and atrocities that were committed against them. The United States wanted to push democracy in Eastern Europe yet the Soviets countered this by saying the United States was hypocritical, since at that time the United States supported the Latin countries that were governed by dictatorships. The Soviets were under the impression that this was an effort to boost the UNITED STATES economy. One of the main reasons the Soviets wanted their revenge is because they lost over twenty million citizens in the war. Even though the United States lost 405, 000, this was not as great as the loss suffered by the Soviet Union. Just like when one person gets mad they have to have it their way or no way at all and the Soviets felt this way. They wanted revenge on Germany and did not want to take no for an answer. As a result of World War II the United States came out the most powerful nation in the world, they had learned from their mistakes, as well as the knowledge of how the war could have been prevented. Therefore the United States believed they knew best and ignored the previous isolation policy. Their attitude toward the Soviets was very cocky because they believed they knew what was best. The United States needed to access raw materials, markets for their goods, and security for investments overseas that could only be met in countries with governments like their own. Th is is another reason the United States wanted to push for democracies overseas. President Truman wanted to have a cooperative relationship with the Soviet Union as long as they did what the United States wanted them to do. He wanted to restrain their expansionist impulses and allow the United States to rebuild Germany and their Allies. Truman knew that he could get away with this because American had a nuclear monopoly which attributed to the United State’s power. Josef Stalin the leader of the Soviet Union wanted to force communism on surrounding nations.

Eli Lilly in India Essay

Eli Lilly and Company was started Mr. Colonel Eli Lilly in 1876. During 1940-1985 it performed as one of the leading players in the US market. From the beginning the business has remained committed to scientific and management excellence. For the past several years the business has continuously expanded in the health care and agricultural sector. During 1950s the business became export oriented and in 1980s the corporation was performing as a successful international pharmaceutical company. In 1992 the firm has its own manufacturing plants in 25 countries and its products were sold in more than 130 different countries. During the same period several countries in Asia specifically India opted for liberalization policies where tax breaks were given and FDI was highly promoted. The business considered it as an opportunity and decided to perform clinical testing where it R&D (research and development) functional unit has contributed a lot. Ranbaxy Laboratories: The business was started during the decade of 1960s in India. It has consistently performed as serious research-oriented company which evolved as one of the leading pharmaceutical firm. During 1977 the business was transformed into a global corporation with its broader scope, vision and leadership capabilities. For decades it has emphasized on the solitary principle of effective marketing research both indigenously as well as internationally. Throughout 1990s it performed as the largest player in generic drugs in India. The competitive edge exists in the aptitude for chemical synthesis. The capital cost was also immensely lower as compare to that of USA. In USA there exists a strict quality control requirement therefore the business specifically relied on exporting its products in 47 different countries. The firm assumes to spend large amount on R&D in the nearest future. Eli Lilly in India: Rethinking the Joint Venture Strategy Q. 1 drawing on relevant academic sources, discuss the critical factors which lie behind the success of the Eli Lilly Ranbaxy international joint venture (ELR IJV). Ans. Critical Success factors for Eli Lilly Ranbaxy International JV (Joint Venture): It all started in 1992 when Ranbaxy approached Eli Lilly in order to go into an agreement for supplying low cost pharmaceutical ingredients. Although Eli Lilly had suppliers India but it could not create fruitful relationship with them. During that period Ranbaxy was the largest exporter from India and the second largest exporter of Pharmaceutical products lagging behind Glaxo SmithKline. Basically strategic thinkers at Ranbaxy analyzed that it Eli Lilly is the only pharmaceutical company which do not exist in India and Ranbaxy can facilitate them by supply low cost material while manufacturing some of the Eli Lilly products locally in India. It was a fine decision where Ranbaxy opted for packaging and selling and distributing products for Eli Lilly in India. Research findings depict that it started successfully and top management believed that there were lots of commonalities between both the companies. Mutually they were in favor of ethical standards, technological advancements, innovative ideas and distributing patented products in India. The act of kindness revealed strong candid about their employees and affirmed on continuously performing for sustainable development and green provisions. Finally the JV (joint venture) was signed in November 1992 and reflected the successful accomplishments from both the parts. Beyond doubt Eli Lilly wanted to extend its name in Asia especially in India. It started with massive investment of $ 7. 1 million as authorized capital and $3 million as equity capital. During 1995 Eli Lilly decided to expand in generic products and went into an agreement with Ranbaxy unfortunately the business founded that it is an erroneous decision hence terminated agreement. Both the businesses resemble to each other in terms of leadership, vision, values and many more but generic requires strong learning curve and was considered different from the core business of operation. Mutual consensus during the initial phase: The top management thought that it was the right decision and forecasted that about 200-300 million people dwelling in India belongs to the middle class and will be going to determine the future of India. The key question remained that why Eli Lilly gave more importance to India rather than Russia or China where it could have further expanded and established its business presence. Moreover due to the lack of intellectual property rights and patent protection in India, most of the products of Eli Lilly were being manufactured and sold illegally. It required strategic thinking to come up with a new product which can grasp the attention of the majority of the population. Furthermore most of the specialists and experts were unaware of the name therefore management decided to name the JV as Eli Lilly Ranbaxy JV which reflects the foreign taste. Most interesting fact revealed that both the businesses started from the scratch and worked for improving the infrastructure of the business where Ranbaxy helped the business whenever they were faced with some sort of issues. The group worked 24/7 and expanded the workforce with key professionals. It had a very limited budget therefore Eli Lilly excellently operated on economies of scale and made the most from Ranbaxy distribution system. In the 1993, the business had more than 200 people working on systematically performing and expanding its real essence in India. It took assistance from one its office located in Geneva and established a creative recruiting theme in order to ascertain long-term employment relationship. Furthermore the business assured new sales graduates that they will be going to be promoted in the company and customized training programs were formulated in accordance with India. The business also developed a ‘Red Book’ and put up with its values of ethical code of conduct. They communicated both the positive and negative aspects of specific drugs and later on it helped them in building trust, faith and confidence of doctors in the company. Both the firms strictly focused on the JV and on building personal relationships with each other rather than indulging in conflicts or politics. Both the businesses specialized in their core business with an upward moving learning curve. Ranbaxy gained expertise in generic products and meanwhile Eli Lilly focused on innovation, creativity and discovery. The initial product that resulted through joint venture was human insulin but it faced major confrontations from formal institutions and government regulations and there were financial constraints as well. There were regulatory issues and Indian government imposed substantial import duty. The government imposed price limitations and profits margin got shaken. Rather than opting for the localize strategy as it was adopted by Glaxo and Pfizer, the business went for niche marketing. Furthermore it could not launch some of its most valuable drugs in India because of the threats of poor intellectual property rights. It requires huge production capacity whereas profit ratio was low. During the initial period Eli Lilly deployed its marketing capabilities around two major groups. The business added momentous value to one of the off-patented drugs and emphasize on two world-class drugs where barriers to entry were high. The JV surpassed break-even in the end of 1996 and started earning profit. Chief organizational changes: During mid 1990s several changes were brought. It was one of the fastest growing organizations and a separate model was structured to instill stability. A proper SOP was formulated and the 50-50 partnership continued. Both sales and marketing functions were streamlined. The corporation hired McKinsey for management consultancy and identifies growth opportunities in India and showed consistency with the immense growth rate of 8% on annual basis. In order to transform into a major organization the business established a separate medical and regulatory function which operates in collaboration with the government to assess and give approval for specific drugs and the entire manufacturing process. The beginning of a new dimension: It has been said that during 2001 the business outshined the overall Indian pharmaceutical industry growth rate. Some of the achievements are as follows: †¢ Due to the JV Ranbaxy got famous worldwide and Eli Lilly established itself in India. It had a unique culture where employees of both the organizations never got cannibalized with each other. The growth rate further increased to 10% and major pharmaceutical corporations got further strengthened due to mergers and acquisitions. Major firms focused on more profitable core businesses and divested non-core set of functions and operations. †¢ Eli Lilly achieved 12th position in the pharmaceutical industry however one its successful drugs got off-patented in 2001 and it started working on its potential products. †¢ Major changes took place in India and China and the business came up with new strategies with proper evaluation and control system to overcome major issues. During the same period the management of Ranbaxy decided to transform into an international pharmaceutical company with the strong research-based platform. It went into JV with other firms in Canada, United States and Ireland. Ranbaxy further considered China, Russia, United Kingdom and USA as major foreign markets. Due to quick expansion throughout the globe it faced financial issues and the business found sudden decline in its cash flows and it started thinking for dissolving its JV with Eli Lilly. Ranbaxy considered itself as a global firm and said that it has participated at its utmost to create value for Eli Lilly in India. †¢ The JV revealed that it has attained world-class sales management process. They further penetrated into valuable directions and key areas like diabetes, oncology, and expertise in clinical trials in accordance with international standards. Moreover the entire workforce performs with high caliber and confidence. Numerous changes in Ranbaxy after JV: Ranbaxy (2010) instigated that the business experienced major changes after the JV and explored new market in different dimensions of NCS (new chemical entities) and NDDS (novel drug delivery system) mainly related to Urology, respiratory problems and formulated a plan for further expansion in developed countries specifically in UK and USA till 2012. It further went into mergers, acquisitions, JV and alliances in Brazil, China, South America, Germany, Spain, and Canada with MNCs like Bayer, Glaxo SmithKline, Ohm, Aventis and many more. It was successful in establishing global presence. Some of the learning factors were as follows: †¢ Major attempts were made to increase the productivity and the business came up with breakthrough advancements and minimized R&D cost. It brand image was further promoted when it introduced important drugs to contest against malaria. †¢ It achieved economies of scale and successfully produced effective drugs at low cost and developing economies could purchase them in an affordable manner. It remained adaptive to the industry pattern, invested heavily in R&D. It mostly got benefited due to low material and labor cost in India and patented several chemical compounds in developed countries. †¢ The business attained technological expertise, successful culture and further diversified into laboratory testing business and conducted clinical trials in Mumbai, Bangalore and many more. It established 2000 centers throughout South Asia. It further entered into service business and facilitated companies by testing a new product and provided approval for ingredients, manufacturing processes and the entire products. †¢ The business gained competitive edge in generic products. It was considered as the 7th largest growing corporation in the world. It gained expertise in distribution network, finance and different processes in the pharmaceutical industry. Q. 2 assesses the alternative options open to senior management on the future of the ELR IJV and recommend how you think they should proceed. Ans. Alternative Strategic options: In order to further enhance the collaborative performance between both the companies, the top management came up with the strategic thinking option. The business must formulate a task force which can look inside the future direction. However it must include top management from both the firms rather than involving key personnel from the JV so that day-to-day operations can be performed. In this way important scenarios can be developed and implemented. More importantly it was assumed that Ranbaxy was going to divest its JV with Eli Lilly. It was also highlighted that Ranbaxy favored to sell-out the business and it will generate funds to further expand the portfolio of Ranbaxy but Eli Lilly considered it as a negative option. The business further decides to invest a lot in R&D. More importantly the expanding and research work will specifically focus on cancer, infectious diseases, diabetes and cardiovascular problems. The clinical trials will be further assisted by the ministry o health. More importantly the business might go public in the nearest future. Key Analyses: Eli Lilly faced difficulties and barriers to entry while expanding in South Asia especially in India. It could not understand the culture, socio-economic factors, and political influences in the country. Despite of being known among the largest pharmaceutical companies in USA, it was considered as a mere business in India. Therefore the business opted for joint venture with any domestic company. Major Challenges: There were numerous challenges being faced by the business: †¢ The business has continuously faced intellectual property rights †¢ Eli Lilly faced lots of difficulties while establishing a positive relationship with the government of India. Indian government imposed price limitations and heavy import duty was imposed. †¢ The R&D cost was increasing day by day †¢ Competition was getting intensive and more organizations were entering in the industry †¢ It took huge time for new product approval which further increased the development time †¢ India joined WTO and from 2005 onwards it further strengthened the patent protection rights specifically pertaining to pharmaceutical products and FDI (foreign direct investment) was also highly promoted. Gradually due to intensive competition and due to increase in number of major players in the pharmaceutical industry, the growth rate decreased and lots of mergers and acquisitions took place. During 2004-2005 it further implied stern control on patent protection. India flourished as an emerging economy which can greatly add value to pharmaceutical products. These all forced both the companies to reconsider the JV and individual strategies. Recommendation: It seemed that both the sides looked for win situation. Eli Lilly tried to establish its authoritative style over Ranbaxy. The business focused in gaining its presence in India. On the other hand Ranbaxy purely focused on generating more profits and further expanding itself globally and becoming an international corporation. It seems that both were looking for their own benefits and they were not concerned about the other party. It seemed that Ranbaxy was more egotistical and wanted to undergo a transactional relationship with Eli Lilly for a certain period of time and decided to negate its agreements once reaching the pinnacle. In order to maintain mutual consent and undergo successful joint venture, several recommendations have been provided: †¢ First of all both the parties must share the benefits and have the authority to control different tasks. †¢ Rather than relying on core business the business must diversify into strategic areas and functions. †¢ The JV must counteract the shortening product life cycle due to advancement in technology and competition. †¢ It must transform threats in opportunities while destroying barriers and speeding-up the process of product introduction. †¢ The business strategy must be integrated with the corporate strategy to accomplish goals through shared values. †¢ There must be high commitment and cross-cultural understanding between both the parties. †¢ Eli Lilly must invest in establishing strict control due to poor intellectual rights. The formal institutions in India lack the concept of liberal education and technological advancements. Therefore the business must set benchmark and promote sustainable development while contributing into technological advancements. †¢ Indian government has always ruled over MNCs and global corporations. If MNCs and global corporations opt for FDI then India impose the sanction that that the MNC must share 50:30 ratio in profit. It is really difficult for international firms to enter into India and Eli Lilly need to compromise if they want to under-go market access in India. They need to invest in infrastructure and must contribute to the national exchequer in terms of tax. The business must emphasize on CSR and opt equal opportunity among both the genders and must respect the integrity of individuals. Successful joint venture results into long-term relationships. In order to transform into a successful long-term joint venture between two massive organizations they need to adapt to the above recommendations. Conclusion: It can be concluded that it was not a holistic loom. Rather than a proactive approach it was a reactive approach. They had not adopted the principle centered paradigm. Nevertheless both the businesses performed successfully in their core business. Ranbaxy advanced itself in generic products and gained competitive advantage and Eli Lilly prospered in the direction of innovation, technological advancement and adopted vigilant strategic thinking scheme. In order to further transform in the long-term development both the businesses must aid each other, surface key issues, formulate effective solutions and come up strategic direction where both can perform and move hand in hand. References: Sage Pulication. (2005). Negotiating and Designing an Alliance. Retrieved July 18, 2010, from http://www. sagepub. com/upm-data/12290_Chapter_3. pdf – Powered by Google Docs Ranbaxy. (2010). Ranbaxy World. Retrieved July 18, 2010, from http://docs. google. com/viewer? a=v&q=cache:Nrn9UEPrl5AJ:www. ranbaxy. com/annualreports/newsletter-2010-ranbaxy-world. pdf+assessing+alternatives+to+Eli+Lilly+Rabaxy+Joint+Venture&hl=en&gl=pk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShyidoDL1vRW7be29h-Qph0U-59nuHIR-_IrhUW1sJ-ZyblNqb-AzBDUg27j4SU_J_GISMExbHLQN0D1HB5VQCBhlroFuaSFxVIojVhRQWLT8pFXWx9qHuMfbAa92fpncoQ7oO_&sig=AHIEtbTU-0Tw2vxYx8AwIHR4SjOtdhXgEA

Common Medical School Interview Questions and How to Answer Them

In a medical school interview, your interviewers will assess (1) whether you are a good fit for their institution, and (2) whether you will be a good physician. Some questions will be similar to what you’d answer in any other interview (i.e., tell us about yourself). Other questions will be more intense and industry-specific, covering topics like medical ethics and challenges faced by todays doctors. The process can be nerve-wracking, but with solid preparation, you’ll be able to show the committee why you’re worthy of admission. Get started by reviewing our list of common medical school interview questions and how to answer them. Why do you want to be a doctor? This is one of the most important questions in any medical school interview. It’s also a question that the vast majority of applicants answer poorly. Depending on how the rest of your interview goes, a bad answer to this question could tank your entire medical school application.   When interviewers ask this question, theyre looking for an honest and personal response—not a boilerplate answer that could apply to any applicant. Remember, medical school interviewers have already heard every generic answer under the sun, so your response must be unique to you. Your answer should also demonstrate true commitment. Medical school isnt easy, and your answer must show that you are dedicated enough to push through the difficult days. (After all, medical schools arent interested in accepting students who aren’t fully committed.) To prepare for this question, think about your specific reasons for pursuing this career. For example, perhaps a meaningful interaction with a doctor influenced you to learn about medicine in high school, or a personal health scare motivated you to pay it forward by becoming a doctor. Start with a personal experience, then build upon it: what happened after that initial interaction? What actions have you taken since that time?  Dig deep and tell a story that means something to you. Answers to Avoid To help people. This answer is too vague. You can help people in countless other professions. If you give this nonspecific answer, the committee may bring up other careers that help people, like nursing.To make money/have a good career. Many doctors are paid quite well, but money should not be your biggest motivator. And again, the committee may point out the many other career paths in health and elsewhere that pay well too.My family is full of doctors. The committee will wonder if you’re following in your family’s footsteps because that’s what you feel you are supposed to do. Your motivation shouldn’t be derived from the choices of others.Because I love science. Many people love science. That’s why there are scientists. The committee wants to know why you’re interested in this path specifically. Why would you be a good doctor? Before you can answer this question, you need to know what makes a good doctor. Think beyond your personal experience. Research the philosophies of top physicians throughout the centuries. Read what they wrote about their interactions with patients, and notice the characteristics that come up more than once.  Jot down the most frequent characteristics as well as any other characteristics that feel important to you. Once youve created a list, come up with specific ways that you embody each characteristic, drawing upon personal experiences and life events to strengthen your response. For instance, lets say your list of traits includes compassion, humility, curiosity, and communication. In your response, you could describe a time when you showed compassion, explain how your personal history proves that you are a curious and active learner, and share how you have become an effective communicator. Answers to Avoid I work hard. Working hard is important, but being a good doctor requires many more specific traits. Overly general statements like this one suggest that you dont know much about what it takes to be a doctor.I know more about medicine than most of my peers. How much you know about medicine right now, before you even go to medical school, doesnt have much of a bearing on how good of a doctor youll be. What do you think will be the greatest challenge of being a doctor? With this question, the admissions committee is assessing your awareness of yourself and of the realities of the medical profession. To ace this question, youll need to be genuine and realistic. Your answer should demonstrate honesty, personal insight, and a good understanding of the challenges doctors face. Pick a particular issue that you feel would be genuinely challenging for you. Describe the challenge and what you think you would struggle with, but dont stop there. You must also present a potential solution to the issue.   For instance, if you think the greatest challenge is the mental and emotional drain, talk about solutions for keeping your home and work life separate. If you can foresee struggling with the unpredictable schedule, discuss realistic ways you hope to preserve your physical and mental energy. By acknowledging real issues in the profession and talking about how you’d handle them, you’ll demonstrate the maturity and introspection the admissions committee is looking for. Answers to Avoid Talking to patients. Engaging with patients is a big part of the job, and the admissions committee might ask you to reconsider your career choice if you present it as your greatest challenge.Remembering my training. If you foresee yourself forgetting your training on the job, your interviewers may express concern about your ability to work under pressure.Caring too much. This vague answer just wont cut it. If you want to discuss the professions emotional and psychological toll, give a more specific answer, such as mental health or work-life balance. In your view, what is the most pressing problem in medicine today? The admissions committee wants to know that you can speak clearly and competently about a major issue. This question requires you to be informed about current events in the world of health and medicine. Don’t try to wing this one—the admissions panel won’t be impressed with a generic answer.   Pick an issue that you truly care about and start researching. Make sure that you understand all the major angles of the issue, including common arguments on either side of the issue, ethical considerations, potential future impacts, and relevant legislation. In your response, explain why this issue is the most pressing problem and how you see it affecting the healthcare system in the future. Discuss how lawmakers actions are affecting the issue, and explain which solutions you believe have the most potential. You will need to show that you have derived your own position from your knowledge. You should also draw a personal connection to the issue. The issue you choose may be pressing in a large-scale sense, but dont forget to explain why it resonates with you personally, too. Answers to Avoid Very controversial issues. There is a time and place in your interview to discuss controversial topics, but that’s not necessarily what the committee is looking for here.Hyperlocal issues. Its important to be aware of city and state health issues (particularly those that relate to the medical school where you are interviewing), but for this question, you should choose an issue that affects the medical system as a whole.Issues that are too broad. You should be able to give a succinct, concise answer to this question, so dont try to take on too much in just one question. If multiple schools accept you, how will you make a decision? It won’t come as a surprise to the committee that you’ve applied to multiple schools, so don’t worry about disclosing that information. This question isnt a ploy to figure out whether their school is your number one choice or not. The committee wants to find out what qualities you value most when assessing medical school options. Be honest about your decision-making process, and keep the answer relatively short. Start your answer by talking about what you’re looking for in a medical school. Be specific about which opportunities, resources, or values are most important to you. Then, explain what you like about the program youre currently interviewing with. Talk about why you feel the program is a good fit for you, giving specific examples to demonstrate your point. Be genuine and positive, but avoid being excessively effusive, as it may come off as phony. You should also talk briefly about the other schools on your list. Your interviewers know their competition well, so they wont be surprised that other programs have positive qualities. Again, speak to the realities of other programs and why they interest you without excessively praising (or criticizing) them. Answers to Avoid I would pick your school, no question. A complimentary but unsubstantiated response wont win the committee over. They dont need baseless praise; your answer should be substantive and personal.Im just hoping to get into one–Ill go wherever Im accepted. Yes, getting into med school is hard, but the interviewers are asking you to envision a scenario in which youre admitted to more than one school. By rejecting their hypothetical, you forfeit an opportunity to demonstrate your insightful decision-making process. Where do you see yourself in 10 years? Interviewers ask this question in order to learn about your long-term goals. Prepare for this question by mapping out potential â€Å"days in the life† of your future self. When you picture yourself as a working doctor, what do you see yourself doing? Will you be practicing in your field all day? What about research and teaching? You dont necessarily have to talk about a particular specialty—figuring out your specialty is the whole point of med school rotations. However, you should be able to tell the interviewers if you see yourself practicing family medicine in a rural area or performing clinical research in a highly populated urban center. Answers to Avoid Married with children. Avoid answers that revolve around your private life. This question is by nature quite personal, but your answer should be professional and focused on your medical career.Working as a successful doctor. Youre applying to medical school, so your desire to become a doctor is obvious. Your answer should be more specific. Tell us about a time you made a poor professional decision. We’ve all made mistakes, and the best way to answer this question is to face them head-on. However, you still want to make a good impression, and you should approach the question carefully. The committee will imagine whatever behavior you describe in your answer taking place in a medical context, so you shouldnt describe a behavior that would be dangerous or harmful in a medical setting. Your answer should focus on a genuinely unprofessional decision without calling your ethics into question. For most people, poor professional actions include coming in late, â€Å"forgetting† to cover a coworker’s shift, overlooking cultural issues in the workplace, or choosing your own comfort/gain over a customers. The committee, who is made up of real humans, knows nobody is perfect. They want you to reflect on the behavior, describe the changes you’ve made since then, and explain you will take this knowledge into the future. Answers to Avoid A serious ethical violation. Ethical values are essential for doctors. If your answer calls your ethics into question, the interviewers may question your fitness for the medical field. Examples to avoid include embezzling money, stealing, lying about a serious issue, getting into a physical altercation, and violating HIPAA.A non-issue that makes you look good. Working too hard doesnt count as a poor professional decision, and giving this type of non-answer suggests a lack of honesty. Share your thoughts about [ethical issue in health care]. Ethical questions are challenging to answer, simply because there is usually no right or wrong answer.   If you are asked to share your view about an ethical issue like euthanasia or cloning, keep in mind the four principles of medical ethics: justice, non-maleficence, beneficence, and autonomy. These tenets should be the backbone of your response. When preparing for your interview, read a few studies and opinion pieces so that you can present a full picture of all sides of the issue. Your answer should show that you are informed about the issue. You dont have to know everything about every ethical question, but you should have foundational knowledge about the most well-known issues and be able to discuss them intelligently. In your answer, be thoughtful and measured. Evaluate all angles of the issue and discuss what makes the issue so ethically tricky. Express your own opinion and take a stance, but only after exploring all the angles; dont come down hard on one side of the issue right away. Answers to Avoid Being judgmental. Dont condemn or judge people who disagree with you on this ethical issue. As a doctor, you will have to treat all kinds of people—many of whom you will disagree with on various issues—but these differences cannot impact your care in any way. Its important to show the interviewers that you are tolerant and fair-minded.Starting with a strong opinion. The committee is looking for a well-reasoned answer that goes beyond personal biases. You may feel strongly about the issue, and you should state your personal stance, but you have to show that you can see both sides first. Tell me about yourself. Interviewees often dread this big, broad question, and for good reason: it isnt easy to sum up your entire identity on the spot. Thats why its so important to prepare an answer. Most of the interview will be about your educational and professional background and goals. This question, on the other hand, is an opportunity to tell the committee who you really are: your strengths, your personality, and what makes you unique. Did you have a fascinating career before pursuing medical school? Did you grow up in a remote community? Have you traveled to over 100 countries? If theres something about you that always fascinates people, include it in your answer. However, your answer doesnt have to be shocking to be good. Talk about your passion for knitting, your goal of climbing Mount Everest, or your unique family traditions. Pull back the curtain on your inner world so the committee can see you as a fully fleshed-out individual—not just someone who prepared a bunch of great interview answers. Answers to Avoid Reciting your resume. Theres no need to run through your entire professional history out loud—the committee can read it in your resume.Focusing on a single anecdote. You might have an amazing story to share, but dont let it dominate your entire answer. If you want the story to be the backbone of your answer, use the circle-back method: tell the story, move on to other topics, then connect the other topics back to the original story.Giving just the basics. Your life is an interesting fabric of experiences and people. It’s not very interesting to only talk about your hometown and the number of siblings you have.   Additional Questions Ready for more interview prep? Practice answering these 25 additional medical school interview questions. What will you do if you arent accepted to medical school?What makes you special?Identify two of your biggest strengths.Identify two of your biggest weaknesses. How will you overcome them?How will you pay for medical school?If you could change anything about your education, what would it be?Where else are you applying to medical school?Have you been accepted anywhere?What is your first-choice medical school?What do you do in your spare time?What are your hobbies?Are you a leader or a follower? Why?What exposure have you had to the medical profession?Discuss your clinical experiences.Discuss your volunteer work.What do you think you will like most/least about practicing medicine?How are you a good match for our medical school?What are three things you want to change about yourself?What is your favorite subject? Why?How would you describe the relationship between science and medicine?Why do you think you will be successful in coping with the pressure of medical school?Who has most influ enced your life so far and why?Why should we choose you?Some say that doctors make too much money. What do you think?Share your thoughts about [insert policy issue, such as managed care and changes in the US healthcare system].